Posted July 8th, 2009 by merryjwhitney
Tags:
PrintIn keeping with President Obama’s vow to make strong FDA regulations a priority, acting FDA commissioner Joshua Sharfstein sent out a flurry of notices, letters and edicts regarding advertising of pharmaceutical and health-related product claims.
One such letter to General Mills admonished the cereal company that health claims printed on Cheerios boxes essentially make the cereal a drug to FDA. The notice went on to note that it “may not be legally marketed with the above claims in the United States without an approved new drug application.” The FDA did not dispute the science or validity of the claims; but decreed that General Mills could not put the health information in advertisements without agency approval to market the cereal as a drug.
In late March, 2009 strong warning letters were sent to 14 pharmaceutical companies about online search advertisements. Search ads are sponsored links above or in the right margin of search results on a Google (or other search engine) page, similar in appearance to search result entries. Search ads are limited to 95 characters, and the link redirects to a brand web site or sales page where product information, including risk warnings, is displayed.
The letters from the FDA’s Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communications (DDMAC) sternly warned that the search ads for prescribed drugs did not include the paragraphs of precautions required by the agency. Prior to receipt of the letters, pharma and advertising companies had followed an informal “one click” rule, believing that if risk information was furnished on the page the search ad linked to -- one click away -- the material was in compliance. Not so, according to the new FDA determination.
Companies have changed their search ads to comply with the letters, but industry spokesmen say the solution is a problem, and that the FDA’s guidance is now confusing and misleading. Their concern is that regulators are enforcing standards created for print and broadcast, rather than devising rules that are compatible with the way Internet advertising works.
FDA Holds Public Hearing on Web 2.0 and Social Media Internet Promotions
Bowing to requests by consumers, drug firms, marketing agencies and others, the Food and Drug Administration held a
public hearing on human and animal drug promtion using Web 2.0 and social media tools. The hearing took place on November 12-13, 2009. According to the FDA, the hearing was designed to: "help guide FDA in making policy decisions on the promotion of human and animal prescription drugs and biologics and medical devices using the Internet and social media tools. FDA [received] input on a number of specific questions but [was] interested in any other pertinent information participants in the hearing shared."
For additional Information on this topic, please see below.
Additional Resources:
- Featured Resource: The FDA’s first public response after November’s hearing reveals clarification and direction to the ePharma industry, Ignite Health Blog, February 9, 2010, http://ignitehealth.blogspot.com/2010/02/fdas-first-public-response-afte...
- Yes We Can: Time for an FDA Internet Drug Advertising Policy, Update, Food and Drug Law Institute, July/August 2009, www.ignitelabs.com/yeswecan/Friede_and_Nicholas.pdf
- 7 Significant Presentations From Day 1 Of The FDA Hearings, Ogilvy Fresh Influence Blog, November 12, 2009, http://blog.ogilvypr.com/2009/11/7-significant-presentations-from-day-1-...
- FDA Warning Letters Caused Dramatic Decline in Sponsored Link Exposures, According to comScore, ComScore Press Release, October 1, 2009, http://www.comscore.com/index.php/Press_Events/Press_releases/2009/10/FD...
- Food Companies Make More Health Claims; FDA Pushes Back, WSJ Health Blog, October 23, 2009, http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/10/23/food-companies-make-more-health-c...
- Why Non-Pharma Marketers Should Care About the FDA Public Hearing on Drug Promotion & Social Media, Walking the Path, September 21, 2009, http://blog.pathoftheblueeye.com/2009/09/21/why-non-pharma-marketers-sho...
- New York Times article “FDA Rules on Drug Ads Sow Confusion as Applied to Web” by Stephanie Clifford April 17, 2009 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/business/media/17adco.html
- Wall Street Journal Blog 5/12/2009 by WSJ reporters Jacob Goldstein & Sarah Rubenstein http://www.blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/05/12/fda-warns-general-mills-cheerios-is-a-drug
- “FDA Blasts General Mills Over Cheerios Claim” 5/13/2009, NY Health News article by Elise Finch http://webstv.com/health/cheerios.general.mills.2.1007986.html
- “Legal Questions About the FDA’s 14 Untitled Letters” 4/2009 Eye on FDA blog article http://www.eyeonfda.com/eye_on_fda/2009/04/legal-questions-about-the-fdas-14-untitled-letters-on-paid-search-ads.html
- “Additional Comments on FDA Draft Guidance on Risk Disclosures” 5/2009 blog article by Arnold I. Friede http://www.ignitehealth.blogspot.com/2009/05/additional-comments-on-fda-draft.html
- Medical Marketing & Media article 5/27/2009, “Industry Coalition Goads DDMAC on Sponsored Links” by Ben Comer http://www.mmm-online.com/Industry-coalition-goads-DDMAC-on-sponsored-links/article/137529/?DCMP=EMC-MMM_Newsbrief
- Microsoft live search advertising http://advertising.microsoft.com/search-advertising